Alex Murdaugh considers testifying in his own defense during double murder trial
WALTERBORO, S.C. (WIS) - The question of whether Alex Murdaugh will testify in the double murder case against him looms large over the closely-watched trial.
Murdaugh’s defense team is still mulling over that prospect as it continues presenting its case.
The disgraced Lowcountry attorney is accused of brutally murdering his wife Maggie and son Paul on the family’s hunting property on June 7, 2021.
The defense has already called Murdaugh’s surviving son Buster to the stand, but calling Alex opens him up to questioning from the state.
As court wrapped for the day Wednesday, WIS asked Murdaugh’s defense attorney Dick Harpootlian whether his client will take the stand.
Harpootlian said he knows the answer, but would not comment further.
A final decision is expected to come as soon as Thursday morning.
Wednesday morning, without the jury present, defense attorney Jim Griffin asked presiding Judge Clifton Newman to limit the scope of the cross-examination should Murdaugh testify.
Griffin said he is concerned about potential questions regarding Murdaugh’s dozens of alleged financial crimes, which Newman has previously ruled to admit as evidence in the murder trial.
He specifically asked whether Murdaugh would be allowed to take the Fifth Amendment in these matters.
Lead prosecutor Creighton Waters, in response, argued that if the defendant were to testify, the cross-examination would be “wide open.”
Newman said he would not issue such an order.
“For the court to issue some blanket order limiting the scope of cross-examination, that’s unheard of to me,” he said.
Legal analyst and attorney Joe McCulloch represents the Cook family in their lawsuit against Murdaugh in the 2019 boat crash that killed Mallory Beach.
He told WIS Wednesday that he believes Murdaugh wants to testify, but there are risks involved for the defense, as Murdaugh’s testimony could unravel any of the defense’s hopes for a mistrial.
However, McCulloch also said Murdaugh may also prove to be the only person who can explain to the jury why he was at the kennels at 8:44 P.M. on the night of the murders, and why he told so many people he was never down there after dinner on June 7.
Murdaugh’s former law partner Mark Ball also took the stand Wednesday as the defense’s fifth witness, offering compelling testimony for both sides.
Ball showed up to Moselle at about 10:50 P.M. the night of the murders.
He said the crime scene was sloppy, not secure, and no one was blocking traffic in and out of the property.
“Did that entrance get blocked off?” Griffin asked.
“No,” Ball said.
“What happened?” Griffin asked.
“People just kept piling in, I mean it just, I mean it was a, just more and more people kept showing up,” Ball said.
Ball noticed water around Paul’s body from the rain that night, which bothered him.
“It’s a crime scene, you don’t want just water dripping all over the place, but more importantly, I thought it was pretty disrespectful,” he said. “I mean Paul was a good young man and quite frankly it just pissed me off.”
Ball also said it didn’t appear the main house had been searched or secured. He felt there was lots of uncollected evidence, which he said made him angry.
He said Murdaugh kept saying, “look at what they did,” referring to the crime scene that night.
The defense then played a clip for Ball of Murdaugh’s interview with SLED on June 10, 2021, and Ball said it sounded like Murdaugh said, “They did him so bad,” in reference to Paul.
While being questioned by Griffin about Murdaugh’s relationship with his family, Ball, who has known the defendant for more than 30 years, had a stunning response.
“The person I thought I knew loved his family, or appeared to love his family, very much,” he said. “He’d take their calls, he’d do all of those things. After September the 3rd, I’m not sure I know that person.”
Ball is referencing September 3, 2021, when Murdaugh was fired from his law firm for stealing.
As much as Ball helped the defense by showing an incomplete, or sloppy investigation, he ended up being an effective witness for the prosecution as well.
On cross-examination, Ball offered damaging testimony to Murdaugh’s character in a way few prosecution witnesses have been able to do thus far.
He testified that Murdaugh lied to him repeatedly, including about stealing millions from clients, and about where he was minutes before the murders.
Ball became the 9th witness to identify Murdaugh’s voice in a video taken by Paul at the kennels minutes before prosecutors say the murders happened.
“He denied to you three times that he ever went to those kennels, did he not?” Waters asked Ball.
“He did,” Ball replied.
“His buddy, his friend, and his law partner of 34 years told you three times ‘I was never there?’” Waters said.
“That’s correct,” Ball said.
“And you know now that’s a lie?” Waters asked.
“When I saw the video a month or so ago,” Ball said.
Ball also said Murdaugh did not appear to be concerned about Buster’s safety the night of the killings, despite circumstances that appeared to indicate the family was potentially being targeted.
According to Ball, when speaking about Buster that night, Murdaugh told him, “He’ll be fine.”
Ball also said he felt betrayed when he learned Murdaugh had stolen from the law firm, and he never believed Murdaugh’s roadside shooting story a few months later.
Upon hearing that Alex Murdaugh had been shot on the side of the road on September 4, 2021, in what turned out to be a hoax, Ball testified he said, “Don’t tell me that jackass killed himself.”
Ball said his friend and colleague was good at hiding who he really was, and most everything he thought he knew about the defendant turned out to be a lie.
Wednesday afternoon, Kenneth Zercie, an expert witness for the defense, testified that SLED did not do an adequate job examining the crime scene.
He testified that “much more could’ve been done.”
Waters re: roadside shooting:
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
“A lot of ppl thought ‘the real killers are back!’ … All of a sudden, he’s the victim again, correct?”
Griffin: “Objection.”
Newman: “Overruled.”
Ball: “I went to the scene. I didn’t believe it.” @wis10 #MurdaughTrial
More from defense witness, Mark Ball: “He (Alex) tore down the whole legacy of the law firm. We’ve had to change the name… because of his acts. I am mad as hell.” #MurdaughTrial @wis10
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
Waters re: roadside shooting:
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
“A lot of people thought ‘the real killers are back!’ The chickens are coming home to roost! All of a sudden, he’s the victim again, correct?”
Griffin: “Objection.”
Newman: “Overruled.”
Ball: “I went to the scene. I didn’t believe it.” @wis10
Even his testimony that was supposed to bolster #Murdaugh’s case, (i.e a lacking investigation and less than secure crime scene) … also shows Murdaugh appeared to get the benefit of the doubt initially, and was not unfairly “targeted” by law enforcement. @wis10
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
Even his testimony that was supposed to bolster #Murdaugh’s case, (i.e a lacking investigation and less than secure crime scene) … also shows Murdaugh appeared to get the benefit of the doubt initially, and was not unfairly “targeted” by law enforcement. @wis10
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
Whoever it was on #Murdaugh’s defense team who decided to call Ball to testify… is likely regretting that decision right now. #MurdaughTrial @wis10
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
Remarkable how the prosecution has turned a defense witness… into their witness. Getting Ball to say exactly what they want the jury to hear. #MurdaughTrial @wis10
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
Remarkable how the prosecution has turned a defense witness… into their witness. Getting Ball to say exactly what they want the jury to hear. #MurdaughTrial @wis10
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
So this is a defense witness testifying?
— Greg Adaline (@GregWISTV) February 22, 2023
Mark Ball, fmr. law partner of #Murdaugh says Alex lied to him about being at the kennels 3 times. When asked if he really knew Alex … he said “Obviously not.” Powerful for the jury to hear. @wis10
Mark Ball, Murdaugh’s former law partner, testified under direct questioning by defense that he’s not sure he really knew Alex.
— Nick Neville (@NickNeville_) February 22, 2023
Becomes 9th witness to ID Alex’s voice on kennel video.
Ball says at least 3 times after murders, Alex asserted he never went to kennels. @wis10
Update from day 21 of the Alex Murdaugh double murder trial:
— Nick Neville (@NickNeville_) February 22, 2023
Alex’s surviving son Buster took the stand, saying that his father was “destroyed” after the killings.
He showed little emotion as he testified, with his father at times smiling at him.
MORE: https://t.co/SuqM4F9tg7 pic.twitter.com/9Zix1INJzd
Notice a spelling or grammar error in this article? Click or tap here to report it. Please include the article’s headline.
Stay up to date with WIS News 10. Get the app from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store and Stream us on Roku, YouTube, Amazon Fire, or Apple TV.
Copyright 2023 WIS. All rights reserved.